CNN IBN has shown the scroll message on it channel “SPEAKASIA GET RELIEF”.
And supreme court orders to release payement under the supervision of Justice Lahoti.
And supreme court orders to release payement under the supervision of Justice Lahoti.
गुरुवार, 24 नवंबर 2011
मंगलवार, 22 नवंबर 2011
Speak Asia mediation postponed to 28th November[22-nov-2011]
Please be informed that today's(21st November, 2011) scheduled mediation meeting among various concerned parties (EOW - Mumbai Police, Enforcement Directorate, RBI, CBDT, SAOL, Haren Ventures etc) under the supervision of honorable Retd. Chief Justice of India Mr. R. C. Lahoti got postponed to 28th November. As per our knowledge the reason given for the postponement is honorable Mr. Lahoti being out for some other case.
Friends ! we are waiting for 6 months and are mentally prepared to fight this lengthy legal battle till its end. This another postponement of 1 week is definitely annoying for all the Speak Asia family members but we have to understand that this is the way Indian legal system works where not surprisingly "a son gets the decree of the case filed by his late father". We are still fortunate that in our case the hearing is going on in honorable supreme court which is still reasonably fast.
Let us keep faith in our company and its management which has fought the case with honesty and aggression till date. In our view the SAOL leadership is very strong and resourceful which is able to handle such a complex situation. Had this not been the case, the 20 Lakh people of India are not fools who are still together and supporting the company in letter and spirit. Our victory is sure but the timing is not.
Lets fight for our "right to honest living" together. Proud to be Speak Asian.
Message from User Request [22-nov-2011]
Message from User Request
GOOD MORNING FRIENDS,
I CAN UNDERSTAND FEELING ,FRIENDS THERE ARE CERTAIN THINGS WHICH ARE OUT OF OUR REACH,THERE FORE WE SHOULD GO ON PRAY THERE IS POWER IN PRAY YES… YESTERDAY I WAS IN THE CHURCH AND I HAVE PRESENT THE TESTIMONY OF OUR CASE AND DECISION GIVEN BY THE HONOUR ABLE JUDGE ON 14THNOV, YOU ARE ALL AWARE OF THAT,WHILE WE WANT OUR PAYMENT FAST AND AT T HE SAME TIME WE ALL WANT TO RESTART THE BUSINESS AS FAST AS POSSIBLE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF IT COMPANY IS ALSO CONSTRAINED BY THE ON GOING ACTIVITIES AGAINST ALL OF US WHICH ONLY DELAY THE ENTIRE PROCESS . IN VIEW OF THIS GIVING A FIXED CAN BE CHALLENGE BUT ASSURES YOU THAT WE ARE GETTING VERY CLOSER BY THE DAY AND THINGS ARE TOWARDS THE EARLIEST SETTLEMENT OF ALL ISSUES .
I THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT FROM THE CORE OF MY HEART THUS FAR AND HOPE THAT YOU ALL MY FRIENDS ARE PROUD SPEAK ASIAN WILL CONTINUE TO HAVE FAITH IN YOUR COMPANY AND WAIT FOR GATE OPENING DAY.
KINDLY REMEMBER THAT ANY ACTIVITY AGAINST OUR COMPANY BY ANY ONE FROM WITHIN OR OUT SIDE ONLY WILL CURRUPT OR DELAY THE ACTIVITY, THEREFORE MY SINCERE REQUEST TO MY FRIENDS BE CAUTIOUS AND AVOID RUMORS MISREPRESENTATION OR ACTIVITY WHICH IS GOING TO HURDLE, THAT MAY DELAY THE PROGRESS.
NOW THE DATE IS 28TH NOVEMBER, BECAUSE THE EX CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI R.C. LAHOTI OUT OF STATE ,REST ASSURED THE THINGS ARE INTO POSSETIVE BASKET.
Meeting is Fixed on 28th November[22-nov-2011]
Meeting is Fixed on 28th November because Mr. Lohati ji is not available in delhi he is going out for some other case… So why are you all creating a panic dear… Maintain Patience This 28th was prefixed by Mr. Lohati and 21st was given by supreme court without knowledge of Mr. Lohati…
So leave your all tensions and make a wish for 28th Novemeber.. 28th November 04.00 PM is Fixed date dont wory :)
Speak Asia Zindabad
Meeting is Fixed on 28th November
रविवार, 20 नवंबर 2011
Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.C. Lahoti[20-NOV-2011]
Our Matter Is In Judiciery… No One Can Give Exact Dates Regarding Payouts, Website And Business Restart.
We Have To Wait For The Hon. Justice Mr. R.C Lahoti’s Report.
There Is No Other Option.
I can assure it, on 21st November , at least our SAOL management will surly go to the committee and will ask for restart of our website because it is mandatory to start the quick resolution process.
Justice Ramesh Chandra Lahoti’s Profile :
Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.C. Lahoti
Former Chief Justice of India
Full Name : Ramesh Chandra Lahoti
DATE OF APPOINTMENT : 09/12/1998
DATE OF APPOINTMENT AS C.J.I. : 01/06/2004
HELD OFFICE TILL : 31/10/2005
Educational Qualification : B.Com., LL.B
Date of Birth : 01-11-1940
We Have To Wait For The Hon. Justice Mr. R.C Lahoti’s Report.
There Is No Other Option.
I can assure it, on 21st November , at least our SAOL management will surly go to the committee and will ask for restart of our website because it is mandatory to start the quick resolution process.
Justice Ramesh Chandra Lahoti’s Profile :
Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.C. Lahoti
Former Chief Justice of India
Full Name : Ramesh Chandra Lahoti
DATE OF APPOINTMENT : 09/12/1998
DATE OF APPOINTMENT AS C.J.I. : 01/06/2004
HELD OFFICE TILL : 31/10/2005
Educational Qualification : B.Com., LL.B
Date of Birth : 01-11-1940
PROFILE
- Lahoti, Ramesh Chandra, B.Com., LL.B—Born on 1-11-1940. Joined the Bar in District Guna in 1960 and enrolled as an Advocate in 1962. In April, 1977, recruited directly from the Bar to the State Higher Judicial Service and was appointed as a District & Sessions Judge. After functioning as a District & Sessions Judge for a year, he resigned in May 1978 and reverted to the Bar for practice mainly in the High Court. Appointed Additional Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court on 3.5.1988 and made permanent Judge on 4.8.1989. Transferred to Delhi High Court on 7.2.94.
- Appointed as a Judge of Supreme Court of India on 9.12.1998.
- Appointed as Chief Justice of Supreme Court Of India on 01-06-2004 (Forenoon).
- Mr. Lahoti Retired on 01.11.2005.
Source : http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/judges/rcji/35rclahoti.htm
Meeting will be on 21st November 2011[20-nov-2011]
Today, each and every one got confused and worried too. I hope this is only because of rumors and speculation about the postponement of meeting date from 21 November to some other date.
Confirmed News :
Meeting will be on 21st November 2011As Current there is No Delay in Meet But if any is there due to any unavoidable reason then this will be update on 21st November 2011 only…
Don’t Believe In any Rumours Going Around…
SpeakASia Zindabad
Speak Asia's hearing and PaisaWorld legal research[20-NOV-2011]
Dear paisaworld viewers,
As everyone know that we all Speak Asians are going through a lengthy legal battle which has come to almost on a conclusive point, we thought of publishing our research on the legal cases and judgement pronounced regarding our business across the world. Since Amway is considered as the mother of all Network marketing companies and also which has fought and won most of the legal cases across world, we have taken it as our case study.
In a 1979 ruling,the Federal Trade Commission (USA) found that Amway does not qualify as a pyramid scheme because distributors were not paid to recruit people and had to sell products to get bonus checks, and the company was committed to buying back its distributors' excess inventory.
In May 2007, the UK Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) accused Amway and distributor organizations Britt World Wide and Network TwentyOne UK of "objectionable practices" and petitioned to wind up the companies. The case against Amway was dismissed in 2008 on the condition that a full earnings disclosure is published publicly, no registration or renewal fees are charged and that the sale of business support materials are prohibited.
Back home in India in September 2006, following a public complaint, Andhra Pradesh state police (CID) initiated raids and seizures against Amway distributors in the state, and submitted a petition against them, claiming the company violated the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (banning) Act. They shut down all offices of firm Amway. The enforcement said that the business model of the company is illegal. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had notified the police that Amway in India may be violating certain laws regarding a "money circulation scheme" .
Following a petition by Amway, the state High Court issued an injunction against the CID and stated the Act did not prima facie apply, however after Amway requested the CID petition be dismissed the High Court declared that if police allegations were true, Amway's Indian subsidiary would be in violation of the act and the investigation should continue. On August 14, 2007, the Supreme Court of India ordered the state police to complete the investigation against Amway in 6 months. In 2008, citing the High Court decision, the Andhra Pradesh state government enacted a ban on Amway media advertisements. Amway challenged the ban and in July 2009 the AP High Court refused a petition the ban should be enforced. As of June, 2009 the original 2006 CID case was still pending at the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court in Hyderabad.
On August 6, 2011 Kerala Police sealed the offices of Amway at Kozhikode, Kannur, Kochi, Kottayam, Thrissur, Kollam and Thiruvananthapuram following complaints. The Kerala High Court on 9 November directed the DGP, Kerala Police to file a statement regarding the status of the investigation initiated against the multi-level marketing companies. A Division Bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Manjula Chellur and Justice C N Ramachandran Nair issued the directive while considering a petition challenging the government order regarding the Kerala direct selling regulations.
One of the most important fact which you all would have noticed in the article is that the law across the world is against "Payment of money on recruitment of People in chain". In India it is banned by Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (banning) Act, 1978. Now in case of Speak Asia to restart the business, only thing the learned counsel of the company has to prove in the court of law is, SAOL doesn't pay on recruitment of people. In our view this can be proved without doubt in case of SAOL business model because here "referral is Optional and not Compulsory". Further each and every panelist is paid only for his/her work done.
From the order of the honorable supreme court on 14th Nov, 2011(where a mediator has been appointed for an amicable settlement of issue among parties) it looks like the major victory is almost achieved because in the order there is no mention of SAOL being accused of (1) "distributing quick or easy money" or (2) "Making payment for recruiting people". The court has felt that its a genuine business dispute and should be solved peacefully between the parties concerned. In our opinion it looks like SAOL will definitely be able to restart its business very soon.
गुरुवार, 17 नवंबर 2011
AISPA have Withdrawn case[17/11/11]November
Good Evening SpeakAsian,
AISPA PIL in Mumbai High Court has been widrawn in lieu of the appointment of the mediator Hon. Justice Mr. R.C Lahoti.
AISPA PIL in Mumbai High Court has been widrawn in lieu of the appointment of the mediator Hon. Justice Mr. R.C Lahoti.
As we know AISPA have Withdrawn case , please go through the link
http://bombayhighcourt.nic.in/
http://bombayhighcourt.nic.in/
Is it a good sign that AISPA PIL withdrawn???
I hope this is the best move by AISPA according to current situation. Hope It will bring back glory of speakasia soon.
I hope Major updates available today Evening from SpeakAsia Marketing Team and PW-Teem.
Supreme court order[17-11-2011]
Dear Paisaworld viewers,
Please go through the following link to see the exact order of the honorable Supreme court in the case of SAOL on 14th Nov, 2011.
This is a public document and for the convenience of our viewers we are publishing the exact copy of the order below :
O R D E R
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
In our considered view, it is a fit case where a serious attempt should be made for an amicable settlement of the dispute between the parties through the intervention of a learned mediator.
We, accordingly, request Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.C. Lahoti (Former Chief Justice of India) to explore the possibility of an amicable settlement between the parties and submit a report to this Court after the mediation proceedings are concluded.
The learned Mediator would be at liberty to fix his fees/remuneration.
We direct the parties to appear before Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.C. Lahoti on 21st November, 2011 at 11.00 a.m.
List this matter immediately after receiving the report from the learned mediator.
A copy of this order be sent to the learned mediator within two days through a special messenger.
Supreme Court hearing[17-11-2011]
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
In our considered view, it is a fit case where a
serious attempt should be made for an amicable settlement
of the dispute between the parties through the
intervention of a learned mediator.
We, accordingly, request Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.C.
Lahoti (Former Chief Justice of India) to explore the
possibility of an amicable settlement between the parties
and submit a report to this Court after the mediation
proceedings are concluded.
The learned Mediator would be at liberty to fix
his fees/remuneration.
We direct the parties to appear before Hon'ble
Mr. Justice R.C. Lahoti on 21st November, 2011 at 11.00
a.m.
List this matter immediately after receiving the
report from the learned mediator.
A copy of this order be sent to the learned
mediator within two days through a special messenger.ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.3 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 383 OF 2011 SOLOMON JEMES & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for stay, impleadment and office report) Date: 14/11/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALVEER BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukul Rohatgi,Sr.Adv. Mr. Sushil K. Tekriwal,Adv. Ms. K.V. Bharathi Upadhyaya,Adv. Dr. Mamta Tekriwal,Adv. Mr. Rajiv R. Raj,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K.V. Viswanathan,Sr.Adv. Mr. Abheet Ponda,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Singh,Adv. Mr. Sabri,Adv. Mr. Vikas Mehta,Adv. Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. In I.A. No.2 Mr. Yashank P. Adhyaru,Sr.Adv. Mr. Vivek Singh,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Yadav,Adv. In I.A. No.3 Mr. Yashank P. Adhyaru,Sr.Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Jha,Adv. Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari ,Adv Mr. Ajay K. Sharma,Adv.,Adv. In I.A. No.4. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Adv. Mr. Aneesh Sharma,Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv. Mr. Sampreet Singh,Adv. Mr. Sandeep Singh,Adv. -2- UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. In our considered view, it is a fit case where a serious attempt should be made for an amicable settlement of the dispute between the parties through the intervention of a learned mediator. We, accordingly, request Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.C. Lahoti (Former Chief Justice of India) to explore the possibility of an amicable settlement between the parties and submit a report to this Court after the mediation proceedings are concluded. The learned Mediator would be at liberty to fix his fees/remuneration. We direct the parties to appear before Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.C. Lahoti on 21st November, 2011 at 11.00 a.m. List this matter immediately after receiving the report from the learned mediator. A copy of this order be sent to the learned mediator within two days through a special messenger. (A.S. BISHT) (INDU SATIJA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
मंगलवार, 15 नवंबर 2011
Restarting business in India..
On 21st November there is no such Court Hearing its a Meeting in Mediation centre of Mediator Justice R.C. Lohati with legal counsel of Panelists and Company to discuss the process for starting payments… ★·.·´¯`·.·★ :::: Assumption :::: 1. First Top Priority will be to take the access of Website from EOW Mumbai without which payment process is like next to impossible… 2. Once The website access is provided then Payments will be started. 3. Top Priority Will be Given To Those who wish to exit (Mainly Those who have not earned anything till now) 4. Second Priority to those Who have Earned but till today have not placed any Cash Request 5. Third and Last Priority to those who have their Outstanding Amount in their wallets which have not been cashed out till today. This above is Simple Assumption and not a final decision so please understand Intelligently and Using Your brains don’t Panic :) *All Payments will be done in Online Mode as they were been paid earlier as offline payment processing is next to impossible and is quite time consuming process … Remember One thing : Speak Asia is doing all these efforts for mainly restarting business in India… WAIT FOR THE FINAL UPDATE ON BLOG : http://paisaworld24.blogspot.com Regards PW-Teem
Speak Asia Supreme Court News 15 November 2011
 |
| Aneesh Sharma |
Aneesh Sharma : Supreme Court Lawyer
Monday, 14 November 2011
Speak Asia Supreme Court News 14 November 2011
जीतेन्द्र मोहन शर्मा, वकील ने कहा : सुप्रीम कोर्ट मे एक जन हित याचिका दायर हुए है इस जन हित याचिका मे जिनका भी पैसा नहीं आया वो लोग पैसा ले सकते है यह पैसा जो स्पेअक एशिया के पास या किसी भी गवर्नमेंट अगेंच्य के पास है उसे लेने के लिए कोर्ट मे याचिका दे सकते उसके लिए एक समिति सेवानिवृत जस्टिस र.क. लाहोटी के हे अध्याश्ता मे बनायीं इस जनहित याचिका मे कुछ लोगो की तरफ से हमने भी याचिका दायर की है जिसमे हमने ये कहा है की जो लोग स्पेअक एशिया मे आखिरी जोइनेर्स है हमने ये कहा है की हमारे लोगो का हक उनसे उपर है/ क्योकि इन मेम्बेर्स को एक भी पैसा कंपनी से वापस नहीं मिला/ सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने इसके लिए रेसेर्वे बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया और इकोनोमिक ओफ्फेंसस विंग मुंबई इसके लिए आदेश दिया है ये सारा क्लेम उन लोगो का है जिन्होंने इसको सुप्रीम कोर्ट से क्लेम किया है., अगर कोई भी पनेल्लिस्ट जिसने स्पेअक एशिया में जिसने पैसा लगाया था, और वोह इस पैसे को वापस लेना चाहता है, वोह या तौ सुप्रीम कोर्ट में खुद सामने आकर पार्टी बनें और साबित करें की मैंने अपना पैसा स्पेअक एशिया में लगाया है और इसको साबित करने के लिए वोह कंपनी के द्वारा जारी किया हुआ अच्क्नोव्लेद्गेमेंट इ-मेल कोर्ट में पेश करें, और तभी वोह पैसा समिति से या फिर सुप्रीम कोर्ट से मांग सकता है. इस काम को वोह चाहे तौ अपने आप कर सकता है या फिर किसी वकील जो इसमें पहले से काम कर रहा है उसके बाबत दायर कर सकता है.
अनीश शर्मा, वकील ने कहा : इस याचिका में हम लोग उन लोगों की तरफ से बोल रहे हैं जो की स्पेअक एशिया कंपनी में लास्ट जोइनेर्स थे, जिन्होंने फरवरी २०११ से लेकर मई २०११ के बीच में कंपनी में ज्वाइन किया था. हम लोग ख़ास तौर पर इन लोगों के लिए इस लिए बोल रहे हैं क्योंकि इन लोगों को कंपनी से कुछ भी पैसा वापस नहीं मिला है. हम यह कह रहे हैं की CID आंध्र प्रदेश और RBI ने जो पैसा रोका हुआ है वोह पब्लिक का पैसा है और वोह पब्लिक को वापस मिलना चाहिए, जो की तकरीबन १५० करोड़ है. हमने इसके लिए अपने आप को इस याचिका में जुद्वाया है और हम इसमें IA - 4 बन कर सामने आये हैं. इसलिए हमारा हर उस आम आदमी को सन्देश है की जो भी आदमी इसमें अपने आप को हमारे द्वारा इस याचिका में जुडवाना चाहता है वोह हमसे संपर्क कर सकता है या फिर वोह खुद अपने आप आकर सुप्रीम कोर्ट में अपने आप को इसमें जुड़वाँ सकता है. अगर वोह हमारे द्वारा आता है तौ उसके कुछ मामूली लीगल फीस हैं जिसके द्वारा वोह इस याचिका से जुड़ सकते हैं.
बाकी आगे की कार्यवाही हम आपको अपने अगले विडियो या फिर इन्टरनेट पर जानकारी देंगे.
आप सबका धन्यवाद.
अनीश शर्मा, वकील ने कहा : इस याचिका में हम लोग उन लोगों की तरफ से बोल रहे हैं जो की स्पेअक एशिया कंपनी में लास्ट जोइनेर्स थे, जिन्होंने फरवरी २०११ से लेकर मई २०११ के बीच में कंपनी में ज्वाइन किया था. हम लोग ख़ास तौर पर इन लोगों के लिए इस लिए बोल रहे हैं क्योंकि इन लोगों को कंपनी से कुछ भी पैसा वापस नहीं मिला है. हम यह कह रहे हैं की CID आंध्र प्रदेश और RBI ने जो पैसा रोका हुआ है वोह पब्लिक का पैसा है और वोह पब्लिक को वापस मिलना चाहिए, जो की तकरीबन १५० करोड़ है. हमने इसके लिए अपने आप को इस याचिका में जुद्वाया है और हम इसमें IA - 4 बन कर सामने आये हैं. इसलिए हमारा हर उस आम आदमी को सन्देश है की जो भी आदमी इसमें अपने आप को हमारे द्वारा इस याचिका में जुडवाना चाहता है वोह हमसे संपर्क कर सकता है या फिर वोह खुद अपने आप आकर सुप्रीम कोर्ट में अपने आप को इसमें जुड़वाँ सकता है. अगर वोह हमारे द्वारा आता है तौ उसके कुछ मामूली लीगल फीस हैं जिसके द्वारा वोह इस याचिका से जुड़ सकते हैं.
बाकी आगे की कार्यवाही हम आपको अपने अगले विडियो या फिर इन्टरनेट पर जानकारी देंगे.
आप सबका धन्यवाद.
Speak Asia case update in Supreme court on 15/11/2011
Dear Paisaworld Viewers,
Till now exact step by step detail of the hearing is not available on any authentic media. In a day of two we need to visit on the honorable Supreme court's website providing case type as writ petition and case no. as 383 to know exact recording of the case. We are expecting entire detail to hearing to be written on SAOL's blogspot www.paisaworld24.blogspot.com also very soon.
However as per our discussion with the officials of the Speak Asia following are the updates of today's hearing:
1. First of all none of the representatives from the required government departments i.e. RBI, CBDT(Tax dept.), EOW, MCA etc were present today during the hearing. This in fact proves that non of the departments have anything to prove against SAOL. This was a very surprising but a pleasant fact of today.
2. Secondly Justice Ramesh Chandra Lahoti who has been appointed by the supreme court as the head of the committee will look after the payout to the panelist. This payout process can start anytime and has nothing to do with any other aspect of the case.
3. The next hearing of the case is listed to 21st Novemeber, 2011 when probably the business restart might be discussed.
Friends ! In our opinion the best part of today's hearing was the absence of all the concerned departments from the court. Not even single department's representatives appeared for hearing. We hope that the BizBasket viewers are intelligent enough to understand what does it means. We are seeing a clear cut victory in coming days. And we would also like to mention that the victory is not too far because when it comes to Supreme court the matter gets a speedy trial and comes to a conclusion very fast. So lets set all our eyes for the 21st hearing and hope that the payout starts even before that.
Regards
Team PW-Teem
सोमवार, 14 नवंबर 2011
Today is Speak Asia’s hearing in Supreme court[14-nov-11]
PW -Teem
आप सभी से छमाँ न्यूज़ प्रसारित में देऱी
शनिवार, 12 नवंबर 2011
Speakasia in current scenario
Let me explain the Speakasia in current scenario:
1) November 14th – Supreme court hearing.
2) November 16th – Criminal PIL (Mumbai High Court)
3) November 16th – AISPA association PIL (Expected)
Mumbai High Court Decision – Raigarh Case :
Mr. Tarak Bajpai and all other speakasia officials have been granted bail. But still Tarak sir taking treatment in hospital. On November 8 Mumbai High Court confirmed bail to all the accused in Raigarh issue. NOBODY IS UNDER COSTODY.
Stay calm and support our beloved Company
Guys, I think this is my first post in this Forum .. I have been like a spectator for so long but I wanna bring to ur notice that on 9/9/2011 there was a news article published in one of the Leading Marathi News Paper called as “Loksatta”… According to this News paper there were 2 Lawyers accepted a Bribe of 30 Lacs and tried to give to a Daughter of one of the Retired Magistrate … They tried to give Bribe to Give the Decision on their favor means against SAOL… This is a shocking News for me too … I do not know the authenticity of this news but just posting this coz I wanna show that there is someone very Strong who is working to tarnish the Image of our SAOL… Request you to stay calm and support our beloved company … Stay United We will surely WIN… Proud to be a Speak Asian …. Here is the link for u … See page No 3…. At least people who know Marathi can read and understand it … Mr.Pw.Teem shared this news in SpeakAsian Powers Group.
Eventhough if it is true, it is not matter of worry because only one honest man in Judiciary system is enough to reveal the truth of SAOL !! Only the word WIN is there which is remain to write down on the WALL in the history and that is for sure !!!
शुक्रवार, 11 नवंबर 2011
-Anticipatory Bail Application’[11-11-11]
Anticipatory Bail Application’s Disposed Date is 08/11/2011 After getting one more surprise I have checked Bombay High Court Website. It shows Status is Disposed and Disposed Date is 08/November/2011. Along with COO Tarak Bajpai , 5 others got anticipatory bail (Agrim Zamanat) from Mumbai Highcourt…
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.895 OF 2011 Rais Shaikh .. Applicant. -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. WITH CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.896 OF 2011 Rajiv Mehrotra .. Applicant. -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. WITH CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.897 OF 2011 Rahul Shah .. Applicant. -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. WITH CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.898 OF 2011 Tarak Bajpai .. Applicant. -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. WITH CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.899 OF 2011 Ravi Khanna .. Applicant. -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. WITH CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.900 OF 2011 Deepankar Sarkar .. Applicant. -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. Abad Ponda, a/w Ms. jyoti Singh, Mr. Sandeep Karnik, Mr. S. Sabari, Ms. Shruti Sardesai, i/b Phoenix Legal, for the applicants. Mrs. P. P. Bhosale, APP for the Respondent State in Appln Nos.896 and 900 of 2011. Mrs. V. R. Bhosale, APP for the Respondent State in Appln NO. 895 of 2011. Mr. K. V. Saste, APP for the Respondent State in Appln No.899 of 2011. Mrs. S.V. Sonawane , APP for the Respondent StateinAppln NO.898 of 2011. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 8th November, 2011 1. These are applications for anticipatory bail by persons, who apprehend their arrest in Crime No.13 of 2011
registered at Mhasala Police Station. Learned counsel for the applicants at the outset states that without prejudice to the contentions and defences of the applicants, applicants are ready to deposit with the trial Court, a sum of Rs.18,89,000/- within a period of one week which has been mentioned by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon, District: Raigad, an amount defalcated while rejecting the application for anticipatory bail. In fact the amount mentioned in the F.I.R. was Rs.1,53,000/- which according learned Additional Public Prosecutor, has now escalated to Rs.18,89,000/-. In view of readiness and willingness of the applicants to deposit the said sum before the trial Court, there should be no reason to subject the applicants to custodial interrogation. In view of this, applications are allowed. In the event of applicants' arrest in crime No.13 of 2011, registered at Mhasala Police Station, District Raigad, the applicants be released on bail on their furnishing P.R. bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000/- by each of them with one or more solvent sureties in the sums aggregating to Rs.50,000/- by each of them on the following conditions :- i) The applicants shall together deposit a sum of Rs. 18,89,000/- with the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Shrivardhan, District: Raigad, within a period of one week of this order, failing which the order shall stand revoked without reference to the Court. On depositing the said amount, the learned Magistrate shall invest the same in interest earning scheme in the State Bank of India, till decision of the trial and shall deal with the same at the end of the trial as per result of the trial. ii) The applicants shall make themselves available on 11th November, 2011 at 10.00 a.m. for interrogation by he Investigating Officer and thereafter as and when required by the Investigating Officer. iii) The applicants shall also furnish their mobile telephone numbers and addresses and other details to the investigating officer. iv) The applicants shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; v) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial Court. vi) The order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if chargesheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre -vs- State of Maharashtra and ors, in S.L.P No.7615 of 2009. vii) All Applications are disposed of. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)
-TAKE SCREENSHOTS OF EWALLET STATEMENTS AND SURVEY EWALLET STATEMENTS[11-11-11]
ITS IS SUGGESTED TO TAKE PRINT OUT OR SCREENSHOTS OF FIRST PAGE SHOWING BALANCE OF YOUR PANEL EWALLET STATEMENTS AND SURVEY EWALLET STATEMENTS FOR YOUR OWN PERSONAL & FUTURE REFERENCES BECOZ STILL ITS EXPECTED THAT WEBSITE IS IN CONTROL OF EOW AND THEY HAVE RELEASED IT FOR PUBLIC TO SAVE THEIR SOULS FROM HEARING ON MONDAY… :) CLEAVER EOW :) OFFICIAL INFO ON THE RELEASE OF WEBSITE IS STILL AWAITED FROM COMPANY’S END – Thanks And Regards PW-Teem
Still SpeakAsia website is under EOW[11-11-11]
Dear SpeakAsians,
Over the last two days our website has all of a sudden become active and is allowing the SpeakAsians to log in and view the website. We would like to state that the website access passwords and database access was taken over by the Economic offences wing of the Mumbai Police. This was obtained from the technical team of the company that used to maintain the website. This action was executed immediately after the arrests of the company's COO and others. Since then SAOL has no access to the website speakasiaonline.com.
Furthermore, we would also like to clarify that the any attempt on our part to regain the server access would have been deemed as obstructing the investigation. SAOL is totally committed to cooperating with the concerned authorities and therefore has not initiated any action that may be deemed as obstruction to the investigations.
The motive behind partially restoring the access to the website speakasiaonline.com is at the moment not available to us as we have had no official communication from EOW, Mumbai Police on this subject.
We appeal to you to not believe false and motivated news item appearing online as well as in conventional media. We also would like to assure the SpeakAsian community that the company has initiated a series of actions aimed at restarting and returning to business as usual.
Regards,
Speakasia COO Tarak Bajpai Gets Bail[11-11-11]
 |
Dear paisaworld Viewers,
Mr. Tarak Bajpai and all other speakasia officials have been granted bail. This puts a big question mark on the news about the COO disappearing from the custody, published by some newspapers. This news and the working website of speakasia shows the progress of the case in favor of SpeakAsia and it's panelist
.
It's time to keep ourself united, informed and motivated. Further details and updates will come out after 14th November's hearing in Supreme court. PW-Teem will keep you informed about everything as always.
